February 2008 Archives

friday: cool books on cool topics

Friday brings us Books About Cool Topics. (Disclaimer: Links to go Amazon; if you buy with the link, I get a kickback. Which I will use to buy more books. Please, allow me to buy more books.)

The topic: The NYC restaurant scene
The book: Kitchen Confidential: Adventures in the Culinary Underbelly by Anthony Bourdain

This is a little less academic than the previous two; I figured it was time for something lighter! This is Bourdain's memoir about life in the NYC restaurant scene, and it's great. Fascinating in places, disturbing in others, hysterical in yet others. If you're the type of person who can't stand thinking where your food comes from and what might have happened to it before it hits the table, you'll probably want to give this one a pass, but if you're down with the concept that we all eat a little dirt, this is a great book. It covers what goes on in the kitchen of restaurants, what drugs your chef has likely done this afternoon, the economics and basics of running a restaurant, how to deal with suppliers, and what not to order in the restaurant. (And why!)

Bourdain's got a light, deft prose style, but he doesn't hold back, either. In a lot of ways, he reminds me of Hunter S. Thompson (may he rest in peace, with booze and loose women). This is a great look into the food service industry, both good things and bad, and it's entertaining even as it's educational.

Friday: Cool Books on Cool Topics

It's Friday, so it's time for this week's Books About Cool Topics installment. (Disclaimer: Links to go Amazon; if you buy with the link, I get a kickback. Which I will use to buy more books. Please, allow me to buy more books.)

The Topic: Religious history: specifically, the Council of Nicaea
The Book: When Jesus Became God: The Struggle to Define Christianity during the Last Days of Rome by Richard Rubenstein

The Council of Nicea -- which is actually the First Council of Nicaea; there were others, but this is the one people most often mean -- is the point at which Christianity truly started to be shaped and codified. Before Nicaea, there were a bunch of different ways of looking at God and Jesus and the meaning of both, and individual churches taught and believed the version that they thought was most appealing. Rubenstein brings us through the argument (which actually displays surprising similarity to an Internet flamewar, although slightly more bloody-minded) providing just the right level of detail, and -- as is very rare for a book on religion -- without giving away which side of the debate he comes down on.

More than that, though, Nicaea was the story of Arius and Athanasius, the two main voices on both sides of the Christological debate, and Rubenstein gives us an excellent look at both men, their histories, their backgrounds, and their motivations, reconstructing very vibrant pictures of the two men from what's available to us today. This is a really good history book, well-researched and eminently readable, and very approachable for the layperson.

go out! look up!

If it's not cloudy out there right now where you are -- and if you're not reading this from the other hemisphere, of course -- go outside and look up for the lunar eclipse. (I'm writing this post ahead of time and scheduling it so I don't forget either, so I don't know what the weather's going to be. *laugh*)

bang bang bang bang bang bang bang

We live in Baltimore -- and, more specifically, on Baltimore's West Side, which is undergoing what is probably called "economic revitalization", but which really equates to "lots of goddamn traffic, roads torn up everywhere, and constant construction noise". A while back, fed up by construction starting at 6AM (on weekends, even) I bemoaned to my friends: Doesn't Baltimore have a noise ordinance?

Turns out they do. But you have to speak calculus to understand it.

Bang. Bang. Bang. Bang.

It's better than the Medevac helicopters, at least; the construction noise is generally rhythmic. But, you know, I'd kind of like the parking spaces in front of our building back sometime this century. Not to mention how they keep turning off our building's water. (Accidentally or by design.)

run, little creature! run!

Today's timesuck: breveCreatures, an iterative artificial evolution simulation screensaver. Basically, you get a bunch of blocks connected together (in often non-Euclidean fashion, heh) and the object is to have it move as far from the origin point as possible; the blocks move at all points of join/articulation, and the locomotion either moves the piece as a whole or makes it work against itself, based on how it's constructed.

That's not the cool part. The cool part is: Every "generation" (25 iterations), the design evolves by taking the most "successful" designs of the previous generation and "breeding" them together, introducing random mutation, and continues to see which one is successful and which ones aren't. It remembers the state, so when you turn off the screensaver, it goes back to where it was in the process when you turn it back on.

The early generations are the ones that have the most drastic changes, whereas by a certain point you just want to restart it and give yourself something new to look at, but: Go, little creatures, go! Have little block sex and build the next generation for my amusement!

White Chocolate Mousse Cups

Today, I bring you dessert.

Okay, okay, not literally. (I would, though. I like cooking for people.) But every now and then we decide to have a dinner party, or I get called upon to provide for someone else's dinner party, and this is what I usually make for dessert. It's simple, it's easy, and it tastes like you spent way more time on it than you actually did.

You need:

16oz. bag of white chocolate chips
1 pint (16oz) of heavy cream (whipping cream)
Raspberries
3 boxes of miniature phyllo-dough shells (usually in the frozen-foods aisle)

1. Melt the white chocolate -- and yes, they really mean it about the double boiler; white chocolate does not melt well in the microwave.

2. Put the heavy cream into a bowl, and using an electric mixer, beat it until the cream is thickened enough that it will form stiff peaks when you pull the beaters out of the cream, but not so thick as to start forming lumps.

3. Pour the melted white chocolate into a separate bowl, and -- with the electric mixer on lowest speed -- pour the stiffened cream into it, slowly and gradually. Keep beating until thoroughly mixed.

4. Spoon a tablespoonful into each of the phyllo-dough shells, carefully patting the mousse into the shell so that it fills all available nooks and crannies. Top with a single raspberry. (You'll probably have more mousse than available shells; the rest can go into shot glasses.)

Refrigerate at least 2 hours before serving. Try not to eat too many at one sitting.

the problem with wikipedia


Comic by xkcd

The last 48h or so of Wikipedia searches

5150 (Involuntary psychiatric hold)
Thrust stage
BOFH
Niall of the Nine Hostages
Human Y-Chromosome DNA haplogroups
List of Y-DNA single nucleotide polymorphisms
Haplogroup R1b
Haplogroup
Population genetics
Hallsatt culture
Celt
Old High German
Alemannic German
High German languages
Alamanni
Old High German
Classical antiquity
Germanic peoples
Getae
Fall of Rome
Dark Ages
History of Europe
Sigmaringen district
Herdwangen-Schönach
Black Forest
List of the Child Ballads
The Real World
The Fause Knight Upon The Road
Peace Corps
Reality television
Thomas the Rhymer
Colitis
Nielsen ratings
Child Ballad
TheGreatHatsby
Donburi
Roti
Steganography
Halliburton
Library
Prisoner's Dilemma
Street layout of Seattle
Four-minute mile
Phreaker
DEF CON
2600: The Hacker Quarterly
Eric Gorden Corley
Hacker (computer security)
List of most common surnames
Community card poker
Computer crime
Black hat
0-day
Texas hold 'em
Blue box (phreaking)
Risk (game)
Kaiser roll

I really need to just set up a service for writers: "email me with what you need to know; I will choke Google and Wikipedia until I get an answer for you."

friday books about cool topics, #1

(Those of you reading this via RSS might have gotten it earlier in the week -- mix-up with the post scheduling, which I am trying out in hopes it will make me, you know, post more regularly if I write them ahead of time all at once....)

So I'm enjoying my "log everything into GoodReads account" project (except when I'm not, but, well) -- but I'm only logging in new books (or books I reread since I started keeping track). So let's do books about cool topics that you don't learn about in high school. (Or at least, that I didn't learn about in my high school; your mileage may vary.) And to force myself to get into patterns and habits, I shall do them on Fridays.

Disclaimer: Links to go Amazon; if you buy with the link, I get a kickback. Which I will use to buy more books. Please, allow me to buy more books.

Today: The Millennium Problems: The Seven Greatest Unsolved Mathematical Puzzles of Our Time by Keith Devlin.

I am one of those great tragedies; I am a lover of math (I can't call myself a mathematician) who suffers from medium-to-severe dyscalculia, which went undiagnosed the entire time I was in public education. (I thought everyone had trouble telling 42 and 24 apart. Or plus and minus. And don't get me started on phone numbers. Or division. Or greater than/less than.) I love math; I just can't do it without tears and swearing. (Concepts, fine. Abstracts, fine. Ideas, fine. Actual problems? I will shoot myself.)

This book tackles the seven Millennium Prize Problems, each of which carries a million-dollar bounty for a "solution". (Scare quotes are because some of the "problems" aren't so much equations to be solved as "dude, this works, but we don't know why it works.") Devlin does a great job of explaining what the problem is for all but the last two, which honestly can't be explained to a layperson (at least not without interpretive dance), but the best part of the book is the background grounding he provides for the mathematical leaps-of-glee he's about to get into.

I've had people try to Explain Math Shit to me before, and they have about a seventy percent chance of causing me to have a screaming nuclear meltdown, because they do it in the wrong way. But Devlin's good at it -- informative without being patronizing or condescending, the way so many specialists can be when they're talking about their specialty to a layperson. Devlin's not interested in proving that he knows what he's talking about; he wants you to see why Hey, Math Is Fucking Cool. And, you know, since math is fucking cool, it's a win/win situation.

really, they should just rename it "surly singles' day"

Back when I was in college (the second time -- long story) I was known for calling Valentine's Day "Surly Singles' Day", dressing in all black, climbing up on the picnic tables in our apartment quad and beseeching my audience to RESIST THE HALLMARK PROPAGANDA, etc. I've calmed down a lot since then -- and no, it has nothing to do with being happily partnered, it has to do with just being too old for that shit -- but still, I'm so relieved that Best Beloved shares my approach and attitude.

Every February, we stop our regular flower-buying (Safeway: a dozen roses for like $10, high-quality, long-lasting, and very pretty on the kitchen counter, thank you very much) when the late-January/early-February price-hike kicks in, eat in on both the weekend before and the weekend after instead of risking the hoardes of humanity in our favorite resturants who are looking for a 'romantic' dinner, and wait for February 15th when the chocolate goes to half-price. (November 1 and February 15, man, are great days for those of us who can't resist the sweet tooth.) And I'm sure you've all heard the rant a hundred thousand times before -- about how love isn't love if it needs validation from Hallmark, how Valentine's Day is a charade that legitimizes the 1950s happy-nuclear-family myth while ignoring the disturbing sexist and heterocentrist underpinnings of the custom, blah blah etcetera -- so I don't need to deliver it again, but still:

So today, tell your partner that you love him or her, but not because it's Valentine's Day; tell your partner that you love him or her because you should tell him or her every day. Save the chocolates and flowers for one random day in March or July or October; save the gifts for a time when you see something perfect and just want to make your partner smile. Practice kindness and charity as a habit, not as an exception. And don't get stressed out about being Romantic and Fairy-Tale and Storybook one single day out of the year, because it's the other 364 that make up the sum of a relationship.

And if you're single, and you're tired of the hype too, I think there's probably a college-apartment-quad picnic table somewhere in New Jersey that's free for use as a soapbox.

the great pain debate

I'm trying to update more frequently -- it's one of my goals on my 101 Things in 1001 Days list -- so I shall branch out a little from just talking about storytelling, stories, media, etc tonight and grab the soapbox for a while:

If I ever meet one of the hundreds of thousands of fucking assholes who make it impossible for people who actually need it to find doctors who don't live in terror of providing decent pain management, I'm going to punch them in the fucking face.

I've got a genetic disorder that means my joints occasionally decide that they're tired of being joints; they really want to be a lumberjack. It's crippling, but it's not debiliating; nine days out of ten, with my regular regimen of 'scrips and a little luck and careful planning, I'm perfectly capable of meeting the challenges of daily life, particularly since -- thanks to the heroic efforts of my partner Sarah, who does so much around here -- my challenges of daily life often involve "get up, sit in front of computer, go to sleep". The tenth day, though, is one of those days when my hip joint is leaping wildly from tree to tree in the hinterlands of British Columbia with its best girl by its side, or my shoulder has put on women's clothing and is hanging around in bars, and on those days, you'd better believe I am reaching straight for the narcotics my (wonderful, fabulous, incredible) doctor is willing to prescribe.

Last week when I was in there, though, she looked embarrassed and said that the hospital administration is starting to really question anyone who regularly prescribes scheduled drugs, and would I mind if we put together an official pain management contract so that when anyone took a look, she didn't get in trouble?

Not wanting my (wonderful, fabulous, incredible) doctor to risk her license for my sorry ass, of course I said yes. Not being the kind of person who signs anything without reading it through first (except for software license agreements, but really, is there anyone out there who reads those?), I sat there and read it. And number 10 would have confused the crap out of me, if I didn't regularly read a few medblogs. Paraphrased (mostly because I can't be arsed to find it right now), it said:

I agree that if my medication is lost or stolen, I will be placed in counseling and/or rehabilitation for addiction, and will no longer receive any prescriptions for narcotics.

Translation: Isn't it funny how it's always the Vicodin that gets dropped down the toilet, and never the ibuprofen?

I'm lucky; my doctor believes in proper pain management (which is to say, a multi-tiered approach that addresses both proximate and secondary causes of pain, works to reduce and improve the things that can be reduced or improved, will take research and clinical studies into account, will happily consider a holistic approach to pain and pain management including other medical disciplines, diet, exercise, massage, chiropractic treatment, etc, etc -- but that also doesn't fail to take into account that sometimes you're just going to goddamn hurt anyway and that shit ain't right, yo). But really, it's disgusting that there are people out there who are making it so that doctors are terrified of getting played.

I don't blame the doctors. I blame -- a little -- the drug regulations and the culture of paranoia that's sprung up around them, but mostly? I blame the people who are gaming the system. And I think getting punched in the fucking face is a fitting punishment, because then they get to know what it's like to hurt like hell and not find anyone who's willing to prescribe them something to deal with it.

the boob tube

We don't have TV.

Okay, that's not exactly correct. We have a television set. It sits over there in the corner, and it is hooked up to a Playstation 2 and the second consecutive DVD player to die on us this year. (I feel sometimes like we need one of those things like you put on the dishwasher to tell other members of the household if it's clean or dirty. The DVD player is currently: Dead.) What we don't have is cable, and the building we're in doesn't get network, and I'm not entirely sure how to get the TV to receive network if I wanted it to.

This basic fact of my life -- I haven't owned a functioning television hooked up to a cable broadcast since I moved out of my parents' house lo these many years ago -- confuses people. A lot. They always stare at me blankly, unable to comprehend a life in which someone could not watch TV. I'm not judging you! It's not an idealistic thing! I just don't value cable enough to consider paying for it, don't hold a regular enough schedule that I can reliably be certain to catch any shows I'm interested in, and really don't value TV enough to pay for TiVo and watch my stuff whenever.

Instead, I watch TV through the secondary distribution model: I iTunes-download stuff as it comes out (or torrent it if it's not up on the iTMS -- come on, people, I want to give you money here, work with me!), and then buy the DVDs when they come out if I like it enough. (This is one of the reasons why I'm so interested in the outcome of the writers' strike, since I know that both these models don't compensate the writers as much as broadcast.)

So what do I look for in a TV show? One of two things:

a). A thoughtful, well-characterized, engaging show that says interesting things about our society while telling a good story, or,
b). Outrageous, over-the-top fluff that I can put on and pay .5% of my attention to while I'm knitting.

This season I'm watching American Gladiators, The Apprentice, House, LA Ink, and Supernatural, and filling in back-seasons of NCIS (I can't just start watching something, I have to start from the beginning), with Battlestar Galactica next on the "to be caught up with" list. I also have a season of High Stakes Poker to catch up on, and am flirting with adding Lost and Heroes, although people whose opinions I respect are telling me that Heroes has some really troublesome subcurrents that will probably make me want to punch it in the nuts.

Deciding which show falls into which category can be left as an exercise for the reader.

a whole house full of nothing to read

I am sitting right here, at my desk, and I am staring at a pile of unread books that is actually four different piles -- one on the "to be read" shelf (a bookcase behind my desk), one on the coffee table (which hasn't been used as an actual coffee table in longer than I care to think about; its primary function these days is holding knitting + books), one on the kitchen table (half of the kitchen table, actually, which -- despite heroic efforts -- is always covered in books, requiring us to shove books aside to eat on the table) and one actually on my desk. And I don't have anything to read.

This is kind of like when you open the pantry, stare at completely full shelves, and claim that there is nothing to eat. There are over two thousand books in this apartment. You'd think I'd have some chance of maybe, possibly, perhaps finding a book (or two) in here that would strike my fancy. But alas, all I want to read are things that we don't currently own. And though I hear that they have these fancy new-fangled things called libraries, our city one, despite being excellent -- I'm told -- has shit fucking hours and isn't near enough to public transport for me to get to it on the days when I am awake during the day.

Clearly, someone needs to start an online lending library. Kind of like Netflix for books. You ship me the book, I read it, I ship it back to you. (Yeah, yeah, I know, postage would be prohibitive. And it's not like enough people read for it to be profitable -- which is another rant for another night -- but still. Sometimes, a girl just needs to be able to build thousand-book queues of Stuff She Wants To Read. (I think our Netflix queue is at something insane like 300 titles now. We'd be making better progress, if our average length of possession of a Netflix title weren't something like three months -- but to us, it's worth it to sometimes be able to get a certain movie delivered to your mailbox within 48h.)

(And hey, if you wanna see what I'm reading, sign up for GoodReads and add me as a friend. Or just check my reviews. I do try to review everything I read, even if it's very quick, instead of just rating it. Sometimes the reviews are fun to do, and sometimes they're agony because it's hard to articulate why I feel a particular way, but either way, it's fun.)

I've had a breakthrough on the book, which is good, and it makes it a much better book for it, which is fabulous, but it's also going to entail tons of rewriting, which is not good. And I owe so many people critique/opinions on manuscripts it's not even funny. And I really don't want to talk about the email situation. On the plus side, I finished one of the two short stories, which is going out sometime this week once I finish edits, and a draft reader confirms that I really am right to get excited about it, so!

The spam to this blog is starting to get ludicrous, and so many people seem to prefer reading/commenting to it on the LJ feed, that I'm seriously considering ditching the MT install, embedding an LJ account, and washing my hands of trying to get the damn spam filters tuned right. Say what you will about LJ, nobody can deny that they're the top hosted service on the internets for anti-spam; I'm still kind of proud of that.

Anybody out there not particularly down with that plan? (Since so many of you comment on the LJ feed, and those entries go away after two weeks, I'd really love to be able to keep those comments...) Alternate possibility is to cross-post with comments disabled here, but that's just way too much effort.

Reading for Writers: January

...wow, has it really been that long since I made an entry? That can't be right ...

Anyway, I'm a little behind in a lot of things, including updating on the progress of "Reading for Writers" -- yeah, I suck, I suck. You can, however, read my book reviews, which I've tried to keep as detailed as possible as I enter books in.

January was a slow reading month for me for a lot of reasons which I won't get into here, but the grand total was 23 books, which I have logged in faithfully and have just sent out via email to everyone who's pledged. It's not too late for you to join in for February! News of the negotiations is promising, but promising doesn't mean "back to work", so the WGA still needs our support.

Me, in the meantime, I'm juggling two short stories, a novel (we are still in That Part of the Novel, having identified a major structural flaw in the fucker that will require a total redrafting -- you'd think I'd learn, this being the same major structural flaw I've run into on several other novels by now, dammit) and a spine that refuses to stay where I put it, this causing problems in sitting up for long periods of time. Like, say, at my laptop. Grr.

about

You are reading the blog of Denise McCune, science fiction author and all-around hopeless nerd. Denise talks about the process of writing and the nature of fiction, as well as sharing weekly stories, snippets, excerpts, and other bits of creative work. Subscribe to the feed, or, on LiveJournal, add [info]mccuneblog to your friends list.

About This Archive

This page is an archive of entries from February 2008 listed from newest to oldest.

January 2008 is the previous archive.

March 2008 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

recently played